![]() ![]() While a growing number of actions may be an indicator for featuritis, it is also inevitable for a large number of applications, mostly professional ones (see e. g. A menubar can organise very many actions.I’m just an application developer with some practical experience on interface design.) From my point of view, the menubar has three key conceptual advantages: The central question is: Could applications from other genres could also benefit from this trends? (Now, before we continue, the disclaimer: I am in no way a usability expert or educated interface designer. This trend is actually not new, it dates back to the 1990s. Media center applications abandon the menubar/toolbar/statusbar concept completely and build their interface around the video viewport and the player controls.Many also move the toolbar below the tabbar, because the state of most toolbar controls (adressbar, Back and Forward buttons) strongly depends on the state of the tab. Web browsers tend to replace the menubar by one or two drop-down menus (see Rekonq screenshot above, or Internet Explorer 7/8, for instance).Examples include Google Chrome, Firefox and Bangarang. Actually, we observe divergences from the classical menubar-toolbar-statusbar concept in many applications these days. I think our HIG is really important to the KDE SC’s identity as an app platform – we’re not just a set of libs, we’re a user experience with its own set of conventions – and we should really take care to manage that responsibly and not lose cohesion.Īt the same time we also shouldn’t be afraid to evolve our interfaces, of course. In one of the following mails, Eike expands on his point: You’re going to have to make a good case for why our interface standards are not supposed to apply to our default web browser.įor those who do not know that yet, “HIG” stands for “Human Interface Guidelines”, a set of guidelines provided by desktop creators such as KDE, Microsoft and Apple, which allow third-party developers to create applications which fit into this desktop just like apps created by the original manufacturer. user interface also strays far from the path established by our other standard applications and the HIG. Let’s start by quoting a mail by Eike Hein on the kde-core-devel mailing list: Instead, people are mostly discussing whether Rekonq is up to the task it is supposed to fulfil, and many people are arguing against that (including the Rekonq developers themselves!).Īs you might already have concluded from the title, this blog post is only going to deal with a tiny detail of the whole discussion. I’m glad that this discussion has not (yet) turned into a flamewar like we saw in the days when Dolphin replaced Konqi as the default file manager. Var src = "/" + arr.splice(3, arr.length).join("/") Įditor.KDE developers are currently discussing whether Rekonq could replace Konqi as KDE’s default web browser. (selectedimg.parentElement, "max-width", width) Then init tiny: tinymce.init(, //("Vänster") 100) Toolbar(DefaultValues.Toolbar + " | code customimagebuttonplugin") Īdding your plugin to in a non Episerver website "/ClientResources/Scripts/tinymce/plugins/customimagebuttonplugin/editor_plugin_v4.js") AddExternalPlugin("customimagebuttonplugin", Public void ConfigureContainer(ServiceConfigurationContext context) Public void Uninitialize(InitializationEngine context) Public void Initialize(InitializationEngine context) Public class CustomizedTinyMceInitialization : IConfigurableModule The button should be only applicable on image.Īdding your plugin to TinyMCE in Episerver CMS using The example scenario is a custom button with dialog options to add Image description, size and positioning the image/wrapping div. In this blog post I’ll give you one example how to implement custom button plugin in tinyMCE.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |